What is CaliberAI?

CaliberAI is an AI content moderation platform that flags potentially defamatory, harmful and high-risk content such as defamation, hate speech, doxxing and IP disclosure. It offers comment moderation, article evaluation, real-time writing and editing assistance, and review of archived content. It is aimed at editors, moderators, journalists, publishers and content creators.

Key Features

Article Evaluator

Submit short-form text, blog posts or whole articles to a web interface for a defamation and harm risk assessment before publishing.

Comment and Review Moderation

Screens user-generated comments and online reviews for defamatory or harmful language in feeds.

Real-Time Browser Extension

Flags potentially defamatory or harmful content as you write, directly in the browser.

WordPress CMS Plugin

Integrates risk checking into the WordPress editorial workflow at the point of drafting.

Social Media Moderators

Dedicated Facebook and Twitter moderation tools to filter risky posts and replies.

Explainable AI Outputs

Shows the reasoning behind each risk flag so editors can understand and act on the result.

Customisable API with Risk Thresholds

Lets organisations set their own risk tolerance and integrate detection into existing technology stacks.

Pros & Cons

Advantages

  • Detection is tuned specifically to Common Law defamation definitions and works across English-speaking legal jurisdictions, which is narrower and more focused than generic moderation filters.
  • Models are trained on curated datasets annotated and overseen by a team with backgrounds in journalism, law, linguistics and computer science, combining machine learning with human expertise.
  • Explainable AI outputs give editors the reasoning behind each flag rather than a black-box score, which supports editorial decisions.
  • Multiple deployment options (web evaluator, browser extension, WordPress plugin, social media moderators, API) suit different team sizes and workflows.
  • Covers both pre-publication screening and review of legacy or archived content, so older published material can be re-assessed.
  • Detects a broad range of harmful content including identity-based abuse, threats of violence, doxxing and cyberbullying alongside defamation.

Limitations

  • No pricing is published on the website; every plan requires contacting the sales team, so costs are not transparent up front.
  • The tool flags potential risk and augments human judgement rather than giving a definitive legal ruling, so qualified human review is still required.
  • Detection is calibrated to English-language Common Law jurisdictions, which limits usefulness for other languages or legal systems.
  • Native integrations are focused on WordPress and the older Facebook and Twitter platforms, with no stated support for other CMS or newer social networks.

Use Cases

Newsrooms and publishers screening articles for defamation risk before publication to reduce legal exposure.

Editorial teams using the WordPress plugin to check copy for risky language at the drafting stage.

Social media and platform moderators filtering user comments and replies for harmful or defamatory content.

Individuals and small businesses using the web evaluator to risk-check a blog post or short article without a full integration.

Organisations reviewing archived or legacy published content to identify historical defamation or harm risk.

Platforms moderating online reviews and comment sections for hate speech, abuse and threats of violence.