Gitdot
An open-source alternative to GitHub, a home for quality open-source software, built in Rust.
What is Gitdot?
Gitdot is an open-source code hosting platform that positions itself as an alternative to GitHub, aimed at developers who value code quality and craftsmanship. It is building a high-performance Git server in Rust, a stacked-diff code review system, and a reproducible CI/CD platform, while deliberately avoiding AI tooling. The platform publishes its roadmap, weekly progress updates and design documents publicly, and is released under the Apache License. It is in early development, with public repositories currently free and paid private team repositories planned for the future.
Key Features
Rust Git server
A high-performance Git server written in Rust for hosting repositories.
Stacked-diff code review
A review system based on stacked diffs rather than large single pull requests.
Reproducible CI/CD
A continuous integration platform designed to be secure by design, locally testable and reproducible.
Public roadmap and releases
Versioned releases (v0.1 to v0.4) with estimated dates published in the releases section.
Weekly build updates
Regular weekly progress posts documenting development work on the platform.
Design documents
Public technical design write-ups explaining backend and product decisions.
Privacy commitment
A stated policy not to sell or train on user data, with planned end-to-end encrypted Git protocols.
Pros & Cons
Advantages
- The platform is open-source under the Apache License, so its code and direction are transparent.
- Development is documented openly through weekly updates, design documents and a versioned release roadmap.
- Public repositories are currently free to host.
- The team commits to not selling user data or training on it, with end-to-end encrypted Git protocols planned.
- It deliberately focuses on code quality and craftsmanship rather than adding AI features.
Limitations
- The product is at a very early stage, with version 0.1 released in June 2026 and core features such as reviews and CI still on the roadmap.
- There is no public pricing page, and paid private team repositories are described only as a future plan.
- Sign-in is currently tied to a GitHub account, which may not suit everyone.
- Many advertised capabilities, including the CI/CD platform and encrypted protocols, are planned rather than available today.
Use Cases
Developers who want to host open-source projects on a platform focused on code quality rather than speed.
Teams interested in a stacked-diff code review workflow as an alternative to large pull requests.
Open-source maintainers who prefer a self-funded, Apache-licensed platform that does not train on their data.
Engineers following the project's public roadmap and design documents to evaluate it for future use.
Developers seeking a Git hosting alternative to GitHub that deliberately avoids AI-driven tooling.